In all analyses statistical significance was set at p Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by Mathematical analysis General linear models were used for linear regression research (Pearson’s Roentgen relationship) to evaluate the newest organization from urinary Na + and K + removal that have SBP. For Figs. 2 and you will step 3, two-method ANOVA which have Tukey’s blog post hoc are did to compare SBP among the many groups laid out on such basis as urinary Na + and you may K + excretion. In order to assess the effectiveness of growing urinary Na + and you will K + removal in accordance with SBP, Cohn’s Impact Size are determined. For the Figs. cuatro and you will 5 general Pearson’s Roentgen relationship was performed to assess the fresh new connection of your own urinary Na + :K + excretion proportion having SBP. Inside Fig. 6 investigation was indeed reviewed by a great about three-method ANOVA plus the pairwise evaluations have been made having fun with Tukey’s article hoc sample. For the Fig. eight cousin frequency distribution are reviewed playing with a great Gaussian match data. 05 (GraphPad prism app, variation 8). Analysis is shown since the indicate ± SD. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of 99 grams/go out, beliefs revealed because mean ± SD. b Relationship away from standard SBP (situated varying) along the entire variety urinary potassium excretion (independent adjustable), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 to have salt sensitive = 0.001 and you may sodium unwilling = 0.008), in sodium sensitive and painful (letter = 186) and you will sodium unwilling (n = 222) anyone. Baseline SBP in accordance with urinary salt so you can potassium excretion ratio (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation from standard SBP (created adjustable) along side entire range of urinary Na + /K + removal (independent adjustable), (Pearson’s R 2 for sodium delicate = 0.0004 and you may salt unwilling = 0.0016) (b) standard SBP according to alterations in sodium excretion and potassium excretion diversity during the salt sensitive (letter = 186) and salt unwilling (letter = 222) someone during the evaluating on their normal diet, beliefs found due to the fact imply ± SD. Analysis was assessed from the around three-means ANOVA that have pairwise testing followed closely by Tukey’s blog post hoc sample. Relationship from SBP viewpoints across the entire list of urinary salt to help you potassium excretion (Na + /K + ) proportion when you look at the salt sensitive and painful (letter = 71) and sodium unwilling (n = 119) people with weight reduction input of Diet Ways to Stop Hypertension (DASH) (a) highest sodium (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 for sodium sensitive and painful = 0.04 and you can salt unwilling = 0.04) (b) reasonable sodium (LS) diet, (Pearson’s R 2 to own sodium painful and sensitive = 0.02 and you may salt unwilling = 0.00002).

Written by on May 4, 2022

In all analyses statistical significance was set at p < 0

Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends

Mathematical analysis

General linear models were used for linear regression research (Pearson’s Roentgen relationship) to evaluate the newest organization from urinary Na + and K + removal that have SBP. For Figs. 2 and you will step 3, two-method ANOVA which have Tukey’s blog post hoc are did to compare SBP among the many groups laid out on such basis as urinary Na + and you may K + excretion. In order to assess the effectiveness of growing urinary Na + and you will K + removal in accordance with SBP, Cohn’s Impact Size are determined. For the Figs. cuatro and you will 5 general Pearson’s Roentgen relationship was performed to assess the fresh new connection of your own urinary Na + :K + excretion proportion having SBP. Inside Fig. 6 investigation was indeed reviewed by a great about three-method ANOVA plus the pairwise evaluations have been made having fun with Tukey’s article hoc sample. For the Fig. eight cousin frequency distribution are reviewed playing with a great Gaussian match data. 05 (GraphPad prism app, variation 8). Analysis is shown since the indicate ± SD.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group Match vs eHarmony cost, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

99 grams/go out, beliefs revealed because mean ± SD. b Relationship away from standard SBP (situated varying) along the entire variety urinary potassium excretion (independent adjustable), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 to have salt sensitive = 0.001 and you may sodium unwilling = 0.008), in sodium sensitive and painful (letter = 186) and you will sodium unwilling (n = 222) anyone.

Baseline SBP in accordance with urinary salt so you can potassium excretion ratio (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation from standard SBP (created adjustable) along side entire range of urinary Na + /K + removal (independent adjustable), (Pearson’s R 2 for sodium delicate = 0.0004 and you may salt unwilling = 0.0016) (b) standard SBP according to alterations in sodium excretion and potassium excretion diversity during the salt sensitive (letter = 186) and salt unwilling (letter = 222) someone during the evaluating on their normal diet, beliefs found due to the fact imply ± SD. Analysis was assessed from the around three-means ANOVA that have pairwise testing followed closely by Tukey’s blog post hoc sample.

Relationship from SBP viewpoints across the entire list of urinary salt to help you potassium excretion (Na + /K + ) proportion when you look at the salt sensitive and painful (letter = 71) and sodium unwilling (n = 119) people with weight reduction input of Diet Ways to Stop Hypertension (DASH) (a) highest sodium (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 for sodium sensitive and painful = 0.04 and you can salt unwilling = 0.04) (b) reasonable sodium (LS) diet, (Pearson’s R 2 to own sodium painful and sensitive = 0.02 and you may salt unwilling = 0.00002).


Reader's opinions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


06AM Ibiza

Underground radio

Current track
TITLE
ARTIST