We opposed brand new SS community data having studies off non-intervention organizations
Written by gcole on May 2, 2022
In-depth interview (IDI)
Twenty villages in which SS ended up being used have been chose at random out of an entire range of 2 hundred villages in which education got happened between , we.e. 1-36 months up until the survey. Out of each one of these 20 SS villages, i chosen one to early in the day trainee for a semi-planned, in-breadth interviews. Half of were selected at random from an email list made by KHPT staff of individuals which it employees think got gained off studies: one other half of were chose at random on huge listing of trainees. All the selected SS trainees has also been expected to identify anybody you like to have interview, anybody that have which it shared an almost relationship. These were not told of factor in this new interviews. The fresh new interview was indeed held in the local vernacular from the interviewers educated in the partial-prepared choosing. Inquiries included its viewpoints on SS knowledge, secret training achieved and you may shared, views on the personal attitudinal and behavioral alter, and you can viewpoints to your change attributable to SS, among all of their family relations plus in town. All IDI transcripts was analyzed yourself to have frequent themes and you can ideas.
Polling Booth Surveys (PBS)
Polling Booth Surveys (PBS) have been used by KHPT and others to obtain information on delicate subjects such as sexual practices; the flirt4free indir methodology has been reported elsewhere . In summary, participants are interviewed in a group, though each person is behind a polling booth-type screen. The PBS sessions were conducted by trained PBS facilitators in the local vernacular in 40 villages: 20 where SS had been conducted in 2005, and 20 where no such training had been done. First we divided each village into 6 segments and randomly assigned each segment to one of the following 6 groups (unmarried women and unmarried men, younger married women and men, older married women and men). In each segment, one house was selected at random as a “starter” house. In this home, we listed all members of the household. If any person satisfied the criteria for inclusion, we requested their participation (if there was more than one such person in the house, we selected one at random). Then working to the left, we followed the same procedure in each house until we had invited 12 people in the appropriate group, giving an approximate total invited sample of 1440 respondents in the 20 SS villages and 1440 in the 20 non-SS villages. We were able to poll 1196 respondents in SS villages (83% response) and 1297 (90% response) in other villages, with a combined sample of 2493 (87% response). In addition, as many SS trainees as possible from the 20 Stepping Stones villages, were convenience-sampled to participate in a separate PBS session. In all 414 former trainees were sampled. Questions were a mixture of ones used in previous KHPT PBS and some were taken from the GEM Scale . The questions focused on knowledge, attitude and behaviour and involved yes/no or don’t know/not applicable responses. The knowledge and attitude questions were the same for all groups, but the behaviour questions differed according to what was appropriate for the specific group. All PBS data were entered into Excel spreadsheets and differences between groups were calculated using a chi-squared test. Preliminary analysis found that the general population samples were very similar; however the SS group profile was different to that of the general population samples (p < 0.01, Table 1), so the data from the SS trainee group were adjusted directly, using the stratum-specific denominator of the SS general population group as the standard population. Differences between groups were then calculated in STATA version 10 (STATA Corporation, USA) and p values calculated using a z-test (test of equality between proportions).